By Marilyn Moore
Two sisters were honored at the Inspire celebration recently as the Young Leaders of the Year. They have advocated at the legislature for a bill to require that insurance companies cover treatment for persons who suffer from a rare disorder, Pediatric Acute-onset Neuropsychiatric Syndrome, or PANS. Violet and Belle, ages 11 and 9, are effective lobbyists; the bill passed convincingly. In their acceptance speech at the awards ceremony, Violet said, “Sometimes, you just have to be brave enough to use your voice.”
Powerful words, there, and a powerful insight. It’s not easy to be brave, to use your voice, especially when you know that some who hear will not agree, will not understand, and will discount what you say. And sometimes there is real danger, both physical and emotional, in using your voice.
We’ve seen three examples of this in the news in the past two weeks. Brave women, who experienced horrifying domestic violence and sexual assault, speaking out. And hard as their stories of abuse are to hear, harder still is the additional line in the plot, that the institutions that are supposed to keep us safe, that is, police departments, sheriff’s offices, county and district attorneys, state governing boards, did not listen to the story, did not listen to their voice.
Maureen Brase, ex-wife of the deputy sheriff in Lancaster County, reported domestic abuse and violence committed by her ex-husband. She reported it at the time it happened, a few years ago, and she made it public again as the election approaches; her ex-husband is running for Lancaster County Sheriff. He denies all allegations. The story was fully reported in the Lincoln Journal Star on September 27; check it out if you’ve missed it.
Earlier this week, Jody Snogren told her story of being threatened at knife point, tied to the bed, and brutally raped by her estranged husband; her children were at home, and heard it all . He was charged, pleaded guilty, and sentenced to prison for 15 to 30 years. He told her to watch her back. He was released after 14 years; he applied for a pardon a few years later. The Pardon Board in Nebraska is made up of three constitutional officers: the Secretary of State, the Attorney General, and the Governor. On a 2-1 vote, the pardon was granted. Then-Governor Ricketts, now Senator Ricketts, voted in favor of the pardon. Jody’s assailant is now able to carry a firearm and has been removed from the sex offender list. She told this story three years ago as the legislature considered a bill that would require the Pardon Board to listen to input from the victims when considering a pardon. She tells it again, now, as Senator Ricketts is running for reelection.
And in a story that has capture the attention of and horrified the nation, a former student at Cornell, Jane Doe, has filed a lawsuit, seeking to recover damages from night in which she was drugged and sexually assaulted by several men, repeatedly, and over a period of several hours. She reported the assault to the University Police. The Cornell administration took some action against the assaulters, though it’s not clear as to what those actions were. The District Attorney declined to file charges. She is seeking financial compensation from the assaulter and from the University and various organizations at the university.
As always happens when a woman reports an assault or abuse, her credibility is challenged. Questions are asked about her behavior, what she was doing, what she was wearing, why it took so long (however long “so long” is) to report the assault, why didn’t she just leave. This has happened to Maureen, to Jody, and to Jane Doe. It takes a lot of bravery to use your voice, and all three of them are very brave.
What is maddening to me beyond the assaults, and the assaults are outrageous, is that in each story, their voices were not heard. Sheriff Wagner can’t remember if members of his department interviewed Maureen. He sure hopes they did…. When he labels her “just a woman scorned,” it’s hard to believe her voice would have been taken seriously.
Jody was not notified that her rapist was being considered for a pardon; she was not given an opportunity to use her voice. She found out about the pardon from a news story, that the man who had raped her and warned her to watch her back, had been pardoned…and she had had no opportunity to speak. Senator Ricketts, then Governor, said that he made the best decision he could make at the time based on the information that he had. Clearly, he did not see value in the voice of the woman who had been raped by the man seeking a pardon for that rape.
The full account of Jane Doe’s report of the night of unending assaults was not reviewed by the District Attorney. His office received a six-page summary of the university police department investigation. That investigation was extensive, including reports from many interviews. It also included the clear statement from Jane, “I am 100% certain that I was raped.” That sentence was not in the summary the DA received, and no one in his office talked to the woman who had been drugged and raped, for hours, by many men. Her voice was not sought. Her lawsuit makes certain her voice will be heard.
There are other voices that are conspicuously silent in these stories. Those are the voices of proponents, including Senator Ricketts and Governor Pillen, of the proposed Fairness for Girls constitutional amendment; it, too, will be on the Nebraska ballot in November. This amendment seeks to protect girls on sports teams from trans girls who also want to play sports. A hot-button issue, I get it. And in Nebraska, it’s handled by state law, and the Nebraska School Activities Association. But that’s not enough for the supporters of the amendment; they want constitutional language about it.
These same supporters, however, have said nothing about fairness for victims of domestic violence whose abuser is a law enforcement officer running for a law enforcement office. They have said nothing about fairness for the survivor of a brutal rape knowing that her rapist is seeking a pardon and having an opportunity to speak to that decision. They have said nothing about fairness for a survivor of a most god-awful night of forced drugs and sexual assault not being asked by the district attorney to tell what happened to her, in her own words, in person. Evidently that fairness is not as important as keeping trans-girls off sports teams.
Violet and Belle are so right. Women can make a difference if they are brave enough to use their voice. Maureen and Jody and Jane are brave, very brave. And with that comes vulnerability, and most likely danger. Their voices will make a difference, either in the next few weeks, or over the course of time yet to come, as women’s voices persist, gaining power and strength, each voice supported by and joined by dozens or hundreds or thousands of voices, speaking truth, bravely.
There is, of course, one event where women’s voices are heard without discrimination. And that’s the voting booth. Despite some recent proposals that would combine individual votes into a “family” vote, with the husband casting the vote for all, women have had the right to vote in this country for just over a hundred years. And we vote; since the 1980’s, women have voted at a higher percentage than men. In that voting booth, women’s stories are important, and powerful, and cannot be ignored or uncounted. Our voices through the ballot can shape elections, can shape futures, can take a stance on the importance of hearing women’s voices in all aspects of community life, especially in those circumstances where women are threatened, unsafe, and unheard. When I vote, I’ll be thinking of Maureen, and Jody, and Jane.
Find us on Facebook and Substack @5 Women Mayhem.














